According to you it is inconsistent to have a storage system that is a mix between realism and fantasy, within a Fantasy setting, which is by definition a mix between realism and fantasy. Your logic is flawed…
For most people Fantasy games are immersive because they are a mix between realism and fantasy. If that is not immersive to you, that is a you problem. Go play different games instead of arguing semantics.
Seems like we are at that point where the discussion is over and the insulting begins.
1 Like
But the game as it stands is immersive to me. I enjoy the friction of the lack of storage space—just like in real life, if you were to bring home more things than could fit in the storage you already have. I enjoy the friction of trying to balance the aesthetics of a nice looking house with a functional house. I enjoy the way things are being handled in the game right now. I like the tweak that’s planned where the amount of things that stack in storage is going to be increased while still keeping a finite amount of space.
This is the most fun game I’ve played in years.
I gladly repeat myself here. I think a reasonable compromise would be the right approach. Infinite stack size or removing stack size is too much imo.
But i see no issue with increasing stacks from 20 to lets say 50 or 100. Whoever still hoards 20 100stacks of pine wood then, has some serious issues lol.
EDIT: and some sort of nice looking wardrobe or similar for armor. i hate that i have 2 chests full of armor pieces, because they are impossible to stack. Give us a wardrobe with 100 slots or something. Slick and thin, so you can put it against walls even in narrow houses.
3 Likes