Hi all,
I’ve seen a lot of debate in the past few days about the housing and when you should be able to buy a house.
Overall, I’ve seen people either saying they like the change because they have more storage and I’ve seen people saying they dislike it because it doesn’t make much sense storywise. I have a proposal to appeal to both parties:
Let’s say, at the very beginning, you’re only allowed to own a house from the slums under Sacrament. Only after doing the quest, you’d be allowed to own the other houses within Sacrament itself. It makes sense: The houses in the slums would be much cheaper, so good for early game. It allows you to have a small place to stash your loot.
Storywise, killing Warrick was just a thing you had to do to get to Sacrament. The citizens and guards of Sacrament still dislike you as you didn’t come when they needed you the most. Sure, you’d be allowed to own a house by Ellsworth, but all of the citizens and guards would heavily disagree. So, living in the slums would be an option as the guards and citizens wouldn’t care if you lived down there. After completing the quest, you’ll earn the respect and trust from the guards. By rebuilding Sacrament, you’ll earn respect and trust from the citizens. Both of those would allow you to become a citizen of Sacrament yourself and allow you to buy bigger houses within the city itself.
Thoughts?